Comparison · 2026
Weaking vs Sistrix
Sistrix is the European reference for organic-visibility tracking. Weaking serves a different profile: SMBs and small agencies that need to know what to fix on their site without paying the Sistrix ticket or reading a manual. Honest take — Sistrix wins on deep keyword data and its Visibility Index; Weaking wins on price, continuous technical monitoring and ease of use.
Weaking
Weaking is a technical auditor + monitor for SMBs: SEO, performance, security and real Core Web Vitals checked in 30 seconds, with alerts when things change.
Sistrix
Sistrix is a mid-market SEO suite focused on organic-visibility tracking, keyword data and links. Its Visibility Index is an industry reference.
Head-to-head comparison
| Feature | Weaking | Sistrix |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | €11.42/mo (annual) | from €99/mo (Sistrix Plus) |
| Free analysis without signup | Yes, 60 seconds | Limited demo only |
| Full technical audit (real CWV, headers, SSL) | Yes, every check | Optimizer (separate module) |
| Proprietary Visibility Index | No | Yes (signature metric) |
| Historical keyword data ES/DE | Limited, via GSC | Deep, years of history |
| Competitor tracking | 5–10 by plan | Unlimited on top tiers |
| Real User Monitoring | Included in Pro | Not their product |
| SSL and security alerts | Automatic | Not covered |
| Tool language | Spanish + English | English/German/Spanish |
| Learning curve | Immediate, plain-language | Medium-high, dense dashboards |
| Built for | SMBs and small agencies | Mid-market SEO teams and large agencies |
Which one should you pick?
I run a clinic, firm or academy and want to know what to fix on my site
Pick: Weaking
Sistrix is overkill: you would pay €99/mo for features you will not use and dashboards you do not understand. Weaking gives you the what to fix in 30 seconds for under €12/mo.
I manage SEO for several mid-market brands and need deep visibility history in Germany or Spain
Pick: Sistrix
Sistrix wins here. Its Visibility Index and SERP history are hard to match in mature markets.
I want alerts when SSL drops, a competitor moves or my Core Web Vitals tank
Pick: Weaking
Sistrix focuses on organic visibility. Continuous technical health (SSL alerts, headers, real CWV via RUM) is not their product.
I am a small agency with 3-10 local clients and a budget below €50/mo
Pick: Weaking
Weaking Growth (€47.42/mo) covers 3 domains and 30 tracked competitors. Sistrix cannot get close at that price.
I need deep link intelligence for an aggressive acquisition strategy
Pick: Either (depends)
Neither Weaking nor Sistrix is the best pick — Ahrefs remains the standard for backlink data.
Verdict
If you are an SMB, small agency or independent professional who wants to know what to fix on your site without paying €99/mo or learning a suite, Weaking is the right choice. If you track organic visibility for mid-market clients and rely on the Visibility Index, Sistrix is still the correct tool.